BHAGVATISM
Talking of Bhagvatism
it had a very peculiar birth. The inroads of a large number of foreigners in
the wake of the disappearance of the Mauryan Empire was a cultural shock to
Aryanism. Quite a number of foreigners took to Buddhism as it was a simple
doctrine unlike Minduism. Exceptionally as a few foreigners started believing
inow exactly this came into existence is not known. This cult gradually caught
on and in course of time came to be transformed into the Vasudeva Krishna cult
of the Gupta period. This stage in the development of Bhagvatism is
controversial. Some opine that the Bhagavata cult of the north-west got merged
with the Krishna cult of the Abhiras in the Mathura area.
The one chief
attribute of this religious perception is devotion or love towards god known as
the Dionysian perspective in the west. This feature was not at all prominent in
the then Aryanism of Hinduism. The predominant feature of Aryanism was the
Apollonian perspective but not the Dionysian.
To begin with it is
not clear on how this off shoot of Hinduism came about but in course of time it
came to be blended with the traditional Aryanism or brahminism. As a matter of
fact the Vasudeva-Krishna cult belongs to the epic the Mahabharata and thereby
forms one of the bases of Hindu religious consciousness even till today.
NEED OF BHAGVATISM
1. Brahmanism had
become an essentially intellectual doctrine. It ignored the right of heart. The
fundamental principles which Brahmanism taught were impersonal and speculative.
It became too dogmatic orthodox violent ritualistic formal and too rigid to be
pursued. The people who were always in need of an ethical and emotional cult in
which it was possible to find both satisfaction of the heart and moral guidance
understood no thing of it. It was in these circumstances that the movement
Bhakti devotion blended with love of God found a favorable atmosphere.
2. These was the need
of popular hero who could be made the rallying center to counter-act the mighty
influence of the heterodox or heretical sects which challenged Brahmanism in
the 6th century B.C.
3. Then there was the
need of the absorption or assimilation of new ethnic groups, tribal groups and
foreigners, and bringing back of these, if possible, who were then known as
sramans, sanyasia, parivrajaka or yogi into the Aryan fold.
4. Secure
revived respect of and confirmation to varnashramandharma in order to establish
social law or ensure systematic functioning of society which would ensure its
well-being.
No comments:
Post a Comment