Tuesday, 2 September 2014

Candidates in Alaska governor's race join forces

Candidates in Alaska governor's race join forces


Posted: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 6:08 pm
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — The independent and Democratic candidates for Alaska governor say they are merging their campaigns to give them a better shot at unseating Republican incumbent Gov. Sean Parnell.
Independent Bill Walker said Tuesday that he has dropped his membership in the Alaska Republican Party and reregistered as undeclared.
It was a move stipulated by the Alaska Democratic Party's central committee when it voted 89-2 Monday to endorse Walker as governor and Democrat Byron Mallott as lieutenant governor.
Walker has been running as an independent but didn't change his official party affiliation until Tuesday. Mallott won last month's Democratic primary election for governor.
Party affiliation and ballot changes have to be made by Tuesday.
Walker and Mallott joined their campaigns after weekend discussions. A combined ticket is expected to provide a stronger challenge to Parnell in November.

Grimm's Alleged Ex-Girlfriend Expected to Enter Plea Deal

Grimm's Alleged Ex-Girlfriend Expected to Enter Plea Deal

TWC News: Grimm's Alleged Ex-Girlfriend Expected to Enter Plea Deal
Play now
As Rep. Michael Grimm is back in court fighting a 20-count federal indictment, more developments in his case have surfaced.
Diana Durand, Grimm's alleged ex-girlfriend, who was charged of violating campaign finance law during his 2010 campaign, is expected to enter a plea deal Wednesday.
Her attorney sent over a statement, saying, "We are optimistic that tomorrow, there will be resolution in Diana Durand's case. We believe that the ends of justice will be achieved. The government has worked very diligently with us to achieve that goal."
Durand's attorney also told NY1 that she's not expected to testify as a witness in Grimm's trial.
Grimm says he's innocent of a long list of charges that include tax evasion and fraud.
The judge has set his trial date for December 1, which keeps Grimm from being held up in court during the election, but his attorneys said it should be pushed back to January because of negative ads that they say could taint the jury pool.
Grimm's is trying to hold on to his Staten Island congressional seat, which is the only one in the city held by a Republican.
He's facing former City Councilman Domenic Recchia in November

3 Fatally Shot, 2 Wounded at Kansas City Homes

3 Fatally Shot, 2 Wounded at Kansas City Homes

Three people were killed and two others critically wounded in a shooting in a residential neighborhood in south Kansas City on Tuesday afternoon, and police were searching for a missing SUV.
Kansas City police spokeswoman Sgt. Kari Thompson said two of the victims were killed in one location, one was killed at another and the two people who were wounded were found at a third location, all in the same middle-class cul-de-sac. The missing SUV came from one of the homes where the shootings happened.
Nearly five hours after police were called to the scene shortly before 1 p.m., patrol cars and ambulances remained on the street near the crime scene.
Thompson declined to provide details of the victims or the suspect. She also said it was too early to confirm whether the missing 2002 Toyota Highlander was stolen or taken by a family member.
Investigators also don't have a motive for the midday shootings, Thompson said.
"We don't see any rhyme or reason," she said. "That's what makes it so tough."
Police blocked off the street near the crime scene for nearly a half-mile in both directions, and officers on ATVs slowly searching the roadside grass for clues.
Earlier in the afternoon, officers went door-to-door talking to neighbors but said there was no indication of a danger to the public.

Federal judge takes up contentious Texas voter ID law

Federal judge takes up contentious Texas voter ID law

The legal challenge to Texas' voter ID law is a test of how the federal Voting Rights Act, which was weakened by the US Supreme Court, will now be applied.

By , Staff writer 

  • View Caption
A federal judge took up the Obama administration’s challenge to a stringent voter ID law in Texas Tuesday in the first test of the Voting Rights Act weakened by the US Supreme Court last year.
For two years, Texas voters have been required to show an approved form of identification before entering the ballot box. The Justice Department and civil rights lawyers charge that the measure disenfranchises black and Latino voters who are less likely to have appropriate ID.
Lawyers for the state argue that the requirement is no different from those already in place to cash a check, open a bank account, or board a plane. But a 2007 study conducted by researchers at the University of Washington found that immigrant and minority voters are significantly less likely to be able to provide the multiple forms of identification necessary to obtain an acceptable form of ID.
Recommended: How much do you know about the US Constitution? A quiz.
Acceptable forms of identification include a concealed handgun permit, a drivers license, or a state issued election certificate. College IDs are not considered valid.
As many as 780,000 registered Texas voters do not have appropriate forms of identification, the plaintiffs argue. What's more, they say minorities are reluctant to seek out election certificates because of rumors that they will have to first submit to background checks,Bloomberg reported.
“Whether or not that’s true, the perception is there to scare people away from exercising their constitutional rights,” Chad Dunn, attorney for Rep. Marc Veasey (D) of Texas, told the federal judge in Corpus Christi Tuesday.
Attorneys for the state argued that the voters who do not have proper ID can cast provisional ballots until they are able to obtain an acceptable ID, according to Bloomberg. 
Texas alleges that the Obama administration is specifically targeting “only Southern, Republican-led states” in a thinly veiled attack on the GOP, The New York Times reported. The fact that presiding US District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos is an Obama appointee has added fuel to those claims.
In recent years, 34 states have passed voter identification laws, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Judges have struck down ID requirements in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arkansas; appeals are still pending in the latter two states. Measures in Georgia and Indiana have survived challenges.
The Texas law first came under scrutiny shortly after Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) signed the measure in 2011. Under a special provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, any proposed change to election law in nine, mostly Southern, states with a history of discrimination in voting had to secure pre-approval from Washington before amending election laws.
The US Supreme Court struck down that provision in June 2013.
If Texas loses this court battle, the state could once again be required to seek federal approval before altering voting laws.
The trial is expected to last two weeks, but Judge Ramos will most likely not return a verdict until after the upcoming midterm election in November.

bluest of the blue California

Obama approval rating slumping even in bluest of the blue California

President Obama's approval rating hits a record low in California, a shift some say could bode ill for Democrats in blue states. Others say the concern is overblown.

By , Staff writer 

  • View Caption
In a development many say harbingers ill for US Democrats everywhere in the midterm elections, President Obama’s approval ratings have fallen to a record low in California.
statewide Field Poll, released Tuesday, found that nearly as many Californians disapprove of the president’s job performance (43 percent) as approve (45 percent).
“This reading is the poorest appraisal of the job performance that Obama has received of his presidency and is in sharp contrast to the 62 percent favorable perception that California voters had of him at the beginning of his second term,” say pollsters Mark DiCamillo and Mervin Field.
Recommended: How much do you know about California? Take our quiz.
“Most of the recent decline in the president’s approval ratings has occurred among subgroups of voters who had been among Obama’s strongest supporters in prior polls,” they add.
Mr. Obama's approval ratings had remained stubbornly high in California. The only other time they had been below 50 percent was a portion of 2011. Given the apparent waning of that rock-solid support, and the fact that California is a blue state, a slump for Obama will likely be bad news for Democrats, say some California-based analysts. 
“Does the GOP – in blue California – actually pick up a seat or two in the state's congressional delegation? Totally possible. Indeed likely,” says David McCuan, a political scientist at Sonoma State University.
"The president’s waning popularity overall ... portends a tough day in November for Democrats," he adds.
Some analysts say that it has been Obama’s handling of Ukraine, and the Islamic State (IS) that have led to the recent slide.
“There have been a number of national and international events where the president has been portrayed as inattentive, ineffective, or overly cautious,” says Charles Gallagher, chair of the sociology department at La Salle University in Philadelphia, who studies race and ethnicity.
“This has hurt his polling numbers with all Americans but what has become painfully obvious regarding his base is the halo effect of being a black president perfectly suited for a post-civil rights colorblind America is long over," he adds.
Whatever the cause, a slump in popularity in the bluest of the blue states "may mean that President Obama's coattails are increasingly small," says Jessica Levinson, professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and former political reform director of the Center for Governmental Studies.
“His approval in a good number of the blue states is below, sometimes well below, 50 percent; and in those states, Democratic candidates often are in trouble," says Villanova University political scientist John Johannes.
Still, he adds, he president's approval has "faded a bit lately, but we're talking a few points. Any one poll may show slightly better or worse results."
Other analysts say the new California findings are merely catching up to national trends. Only 42 percent of Americans approve of the president's job performance, according the Gallup poll's three-day rolling average.
Despite these low numbers, Obama still remains far less unpopular than Congress, which has a 13 percent approval rating, or the Republican Party,at 34 percent, up from an all-time low of 28 percent during the 2013 government shutdown, according to Gallup.
William Rosenberg, director of Drexel University’s Survey Research Center, says the Field Poll changes are within the margin of error and therefore signal very little, if anything.
“If you look at the approval/disapproval figures for April, June, and now August, there is essentially no change, so I feel this 'Oh, the sky is falling' assessment for Democrats is incorrect," says Rosenberg. "The change might be slight, but certainly not dramatic.”
“I wouldn’t read too much into this poll," adds Matthew Kerbel, author of "Netroots: Online Progressives and the Transformation of American Politics." "Obama’s numbers reflect frustration with the president, but they are not too far out of line with what you might expect for a president in his sixth year serving at a decidedly negative political moment."
Moreover, other analysts say, Obama’s once-soaring popularity has always been due for a large falloff.
“This president has always had an appointment with disappointment. In 2008, expectations were so high that no mortal could meet them,” says John Pitney, professor of government at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, Calif. “The president also suffers from the lack of a clear opponent. In 2012, he could say, in essence, “At least I’m not Romney.”

British Leader’s Plan Targets Jihadists’ Passports

Photo
Prime Minister David Cameron, center, wants new police powers to deal with Britons who return after fighting as militants. CreditPeter Macdiarmid/Getty Images
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
LONDON — Prime Minister David Cameron, trying to show toughness in the face of young British Muslims’ going off to fight in Syria and Iraq, proposed legislation on Monday that would give the police the power to seize the passports of Britons suspected of having traveled abroad to fight with militant groups.
Mr. Cameron told Parliament that the government would draft laws to bar people suspected of having fought with radical Islamist groups from returning to Britain, and that the police would be given temporary powers to take passports from Britons suspected of wanting to travel abroad to fight. Police and security officials would be given enhanced powers to monitor suspects who have returned to Britain, Mr. Cameron said.
With a sharply contested general election scheduled for May, the government, a coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, has already faced criticism that it is eroding the civil liberties of suspects for essentially political purposes.
But the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has caused real security worries here, made worse by a recent video that appeared to show the beheading of a kidnapped American journalist by a masked Islamist fighter with a British accent.
Officials say that at least 500 Britons have gone to Syria or Iraq to fight, and that perhaps half have returned here.
On Friday, Britain raised its terrorism threat level to “severe,” one level below the highest, indicating that an attack at home is considered “highly likely.”
Mr. Cameron said on Monday that “adhering to British values is not an option or a choice,” but “a duty for all those who live in these islands.” He added that “we will in the end defeat this extremism, and we will secure our way of life for generations to come.”
The British police have said that in the first half of the year they arrested 69 people linked to fighting in Syria.
A former leader of the Liberal Democrats, Paddy Ashdown, warned on Sunday that civil liberties could be at risk. “It is always easy to persuade frightened people to part with their liberties,” he wrote in The Observer. “It is always right for politicians who value liberty to resist attempts to increase arbitrary executive powers,” unless justified, he said, “by actual facts.”
Mr. Cameron said, “We have all been shocked and sickened by the barbarism we have witnessed in Iraq this summer,” adding that he was acting “to fill specific gaps in our armory.” He defined those gaps as “preventing suspects from traveling, and dealing decisively with those already here who pose a risk.”
How many pose a risk is unclear. Many of those who go to fight are doing so, they say, to defend Islam in Syria and Iraq, to build an Islamic caliphate with ISIS or to fight the Syrian government, and many say they have no interest in bringing violence home to Britain. At the same time, officials caution, it would take only a few people who bring the war home to do a great deal of damage.

Girl who fatally shot Arizona gun instructor said weapon was too powerful

Girl who fatally shot Arizona gun instructor said weapon was too powerful

by   Sep 3, 2014 04:45 IST
#Argentina   #Business   #France   #India   #Italy   #markets   #Mexico   #Russia  
PHOENIX (Reuters) - A 9-year-old girl who fatally shot a gun range instructor with an Uzi submachine gun last week told her mother immediately afterward that the weapon was too much for her to handle and had hurt her shoulder, said a sheriff's report released on Tuesday.
The girl's family also did not realize right away that the instructor, 39-year-old Charles Vacca, had been struck by a round from the gun, the Mohave County Sheriff's Office report said.
Vacca had been showing the girl how to fire an Uzi at the Arizona Last Stop gun range in remote White Hills last week when the recoil caused her to lose control of the high-powered weapon, the sheriff's office has said.
Vacca was struck by at least one bullet and later died, in an accident that touched off debate over the wisdom of giving children access to high-powered firearms, even in a controlled setting such as a gun range.
The sheriff's office has said no criminal charges were pending after what it described as an "industrial accident." State occupational health and safety officials have opened their own investigation.
The girl's mother, who was visibly upset, told officers that immediately following the shooting, her daughter "turned to her (and) told her the gun was too much for her and hurt her shoulder," the report said.
"(The mother) said no one knew Vacca was shot until the other instructor ran over," an officer wrote.
Another officer, citing another instructor at the range, said that when the girl fired the weapon, it went "straight up in the air." Vacca fell to his left toward a table, blood pouring from the wound.
When officers arrived, they found Vacca on the ground still breathing and moaning as another man applied a towel to his head. Blood covered a folding table next to him.
A video clip of the moments leading up to the shooting, released by the sheriff's office and circulating on the Internet, shows Vacca giving a girl in pink shorts hands-on instruction as she aims the Uzi at a target.
He is heard encouraging the girl and asking her to squeeze off one shot before telling her: "All right, full auto." The weapon then unleashes multiple rounds as the video cuts off. It was apparently moments later that Vacca was shot.
The Last Stop is a tourist hub that includes a restaurant, bar, RV park and general store and is decorated with paintings of firearms, faux bullet holes and crosshairs and a mural depicting a gun-toting Sylvester Stallone in the film "Rambo."
The range has a "Burgers and Bullets" program offering customers lunch with a trip to the range, where they can choose from more than 20 automatic weapons to shoot, according to the Last Stop website. It lists the minimum age as 8.
The family had been visiting Last Stop from Las Vegas and had taken a ride on a "monster truck" before trying the shooting range, the report said.
(Reporting by David Schwartz and Dan Whitcomb; Writing by Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Peter Cooney)
This story has not been edited by Firstpost staff and is generated by auto-feed.

A third flight is diverted over a reclining seat spat

A third flight is diverted over a reclining seat spat

There's no law against reclining seats on airplanes, but that doesn't mean they aren't causing problems.
Delta Airlines Flight 2370 from New York LaGuardia to West Palm Beach was diverted to Jacksonville, Florida, after two passengers got in a dispute over a reclining seat, according to a witness who spoke with local television station News 4 JAX.
"This woman sitting next to me knitting tried reclining her seat back, the woman behind her started screaming and swearing," said Aaron Klipin, who was on board and said the passenger behind her was trying to sleep on the tray table.
"The flight attendant came over and that exacerbated what was going on. She demanded the flight land."
Klipin added: "She said something to the effect of, 'I don't care about the consequences, put this plane down now.' She started swearing at the flight attendants and demanding the flight land. The flight attendant spoke to the captain while somebody was blocking her path to the cabin. A few minutes later an announcement came on that we were diverting to Jacksonville."
Delta said in a statement the flight was diverted "due to safety reasons in regard to a passenger issue."
"Local law enforcement met the flight and removed the passenger," a Delta statement said.
After the passenger was removed, the flight continued and arrived in West Palm Beach.
This follows two other flights that were diverted last week. On August 27, a flight on its way to Paris was diverted to Boston after a man became upset about the person reclining the seat in front of him.
A few days earlier, on August 24, a flight was diverted when a man used a Knee Defender device to prevent the woman in front of him from reclining.
After a flight attendant intervened, the woman threw water on the man. Both the man and the woman were left in Chicago as the flight continued on its way to Denver.
Some airlines, like Spirit Airlines and Ryanair, have removed the ability to recline seats.

30 Years Later, 2 Men's Convictions Overturned in Rape-Murder

30 Years Later, 2 Men's Convictions Overturned in Rape-Murder

PHOTO: Henry McCollum sits quietly as thunderous applause rings out around him in a Robeson County courtroom, Sept. 2, 2014 in Lumberton, N.C.
One of North Carolina's longest-serving death-row inmates and his half brother are being freed after three decades in prison after another man's DNA was discovered on a cigarette butt left near the body of a girl the siblings were convicted of killing.
On Tuesday, a judge overturned the convictions of Henry McCollum, 50, and Leon Brown, 46, in the 1983 rape and murder of Sabrina Buie, citing the new evidence that they didn't commit the crime. The ruling is the latest twist in a notorious legal case that began with what defense attorneys said were coerced confessions from two scared teenagers with low IQs. McCollum was 19 at the time and Brown was 15.
Superior Court Judge Douglas Sasser said the new DNA results contradicted the case prosecutors put forward at the men's trials.
He said he was vacating their convictions and ordering their release "based on significant new evidence that they are, in fact, innocent."
Family members of the men gasped and some sobbed as the judge announced his decision to the packed courtroom. Brown smiled and shook a defense lawyer's hand and McCollum looked spent and relieved
"We waited years and years," said James McCollum, Henry McCollum's father. "We kept the faith."
Defense lawyers petitioned for their release after a recent analysis from the butt pointed to another man who lived near the soybean field where Buie's body was found in Robeson County. That man is already serving a life sentence for a similar rape and murder that happened less than a month later.
Because of paperwork, it will likely take until Wednesday for the men to walk free, said Keith Acree, spokesman for the state prison system. They are required to return to the prisons where they have been serving time before they can be processed out.
The men's freedom hinged largely on the local prosecutor's acknowledgement of the strong evidence of their innocence.
"The evidence you heard today in my opinion negates the evidence presented at trial," Johnson Britt, the Robeson County district attorney, said during a closing statement before the judge announced his decision. Britt was not the prosecutor of the men.
Even if the men were granted a new trial, Britt said: "Based upon this new evidence, the state does not have a case to prosecute."
Minutes later, Sasser made his ruling.
The day-long evidence hearing included testimony from Sharon Stellato. The associate director of the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission discussed three interviews she had over the summer with the 74-year-old inmate, who was convicted of assaulting three other women and now suspected of killing Buie. The Associated Press does not generally disclose the names of criminal suspects unless they are charged.
According to Stellato, the inmate said at first he didn't know Buie. But in later interviews, he said the girl would come to his house and buy cigarettes for him.
The man also told them he saw the girl the night she went missing and gave her a coat and hat because it was raining, Stellato said. He told the commission that's why his DNA may have been at the scene. Stellato said weather records show it didn't rain the night Buie went missing or the next day.
Stellato also said the man repeatedly told her McCollum and Brown are innocent.